UPDATE: A few more links added for further and detailed reading, see list below.
I’ve recently started to read Freakonomics and obeying the rules of synchronicity (is this Fringe science or what, anyway!), as the authors published their new book ‘Superfreakonomics’, I started to realize how problematic their case and style is. So I simply note down some criticisms I have just discovered via reliable sources:
- Language Log: Freakonomics: the intellectual’s Glenn Beck?
- Andrew Gelman’s blog on Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science: My review of Freakonomics 2
- The New Republic: Does “Superfreakonomics” Need A Do-Over?
- The Daily Dish: Not So Superfreak
- The New Republic: Freaks and Geeks; How Freakonomics is ruining the dismal science.
- The New Republic: Revenge of the Nerd
- Conscience of a Liberal (Paul Krugman): A counterintuitive train wreck
- Six Questions for Levitt and Dubner (More Superfreakonomics Blogging)
I started to think what we need is to start a kind of meta-criticism, or maybe observe and understand the recent trends that lead to books like Freakonomics, Tipping Point, etc. Just another idea to think about as time goes by…
Benzer Yazılar / Similar Posts:
- Researchers Can Read Thoughts To Decipher What A Person Is Actually Seeing
- China: Ready to dominate the world of science?
- What does Donald Knuth use for his daily computing?
- Atatürk Ermenistan’ı İşgal Mi Etti?
- Testere, yay, zımpara kağıdı ve matkap ile Bizet’nin Carmen’inden bir bölüm
- %7 Solution, İstanbul, Constantinople
- Bir yüzücü su bittiğinde nereye gider?
- Türkçe morfolojisi
- Master Modeler Explains: Why Model?
- Filmler, animeler, notlar…
3 comments so far
Leave a reply